![]() ![]() These national maps, which traced the coastal boundaries of Japan, bound the abstract “collective memory” (as Eiko Ikegami describes it) or the “library of public information” (as Mary Elizabeth Berry describes it) that emerged in the late eighteenth century. To begin with, maps by Mamiya and Inô served as spatial parallels of an emerging “national consciousness” in Japan, one that was taking place in “nativist” (kokugaku) discursive communities around the country. In this article, which appeared in the Journal of Historical Geography, I argue that early modern Japanese maps, specifically those drafted by Mamiya Rinzô (1775-1844) and Inô Tadataka (1745-1818), function in multiple capacities and, therefore, contain layers of “historically specific codes” that, if contextualized properly, enhance our understanding of Japanese history and, more broadly, East Asian history. Mostly, they provided a “geopolitical framework” for nineteenth-century European powers but China and Japan also deployed modern maps to anticipate their empires. ![]() That is, as Daniel Clayton writes, maps provided the scientific “geopolitical framework” for colonial projects. Because maps serve as an “authoritative” resource, one often controlled by the state, they were used to delineate nations and anticipate empires. Historians have become adept at interrogating and deconstructing written documents, but they have proven less adept at exposing the “historically specific codes” contained in maps. Maps can be tricky, however, because, as a product of cartography, they can be disguised as just another “valueless” or “objective” science. ![]() Harley argued that maps represent a kind of historical language, one that speaks as loudly as written documents. Even as the product of cross-cultural negotiations, however, they still proved compelling tools in the anticipation and creation of empire. European mapmakers negotiated with locals for access to geographical information. Michael Bravo, by contrast, has cautioned that even “stable, portable” maps, ones drawn according to the language of science, need to be seen as the results of the cross-cultural production of knowledge. In this manner, maps were stable and movable inscriptions that charted the pathways and borders of the colonial enterprise. Indeed, with the crafting of maps according to the language of science, the “implicit” understanding of locals became “explicit” information used in Europe’s capital cities and “local” ways of knowing succumbed to European “universal” knowledge. In this process, local “beliefs” (of native groups) were transformed into normative “knowledge” to be deployed by European states in elaborate colonial projects. Bruno Latour argued that maps, when crafted by European imperialists according to the “language of science,” and then dispatched to “centers of calculation,” concentrated scientific knowledge in the hands of imperial states. They can depict cadastral surveys they can also depict Buddhist cosmologies. This is certainly true of the maps drawn by Mamiya Rinzô, a collection of beautifully preserved pieces held at the Resource Collection for Northern Studies (Hoppô Shiryô Shitsu) at Hokkaido University.īecause they are such rich sources, and because there are so many kinds, maps can be interpreted in numerous ways. Students learn that maps often represent – and often even drive – major historical events. Of course, maps – particularly pre-modern maps drawn before the global spread of the cartographic sciences – contain marginal text but because they are visual sources, they can, with the aid of an adept teacher, appeal to the creative inclinations of a notoriously visually oriented generation. This is complicated if the student’s interest is Tokugawa Japan, because archival documentation is notoriously difficult to read. Recently, major research universities have pushed the importance of “original” undergraduate research. Because of their power as historical sources, maps also serve as useful pedagogical devices when teaching about Japan. Whether they delineate tidal patterns, measure altitude, chart seafloors, identify ethnic communities, or bind nations, maps provide a potent lens through which people view the world and, in turn, spatially contextualize their experiences. Maps can be powerful tools of nation building and empire, and therefore powerful historical sources. Mamiya Rinzô and the Japanese Exploration of Sakhalin Island: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |